Sunday 19 January 2014

PEKA Chemistry form 5 chapter 1 (To study the effect of the concentration of sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, solution on the rate of reaction.)

Aim                             : To study the effect of the concentration of sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3,                                        solution on the rate of reaction.

Problem statement      : How does the concentration of sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, solution affect the rate of reaction?

Hypothesis                  : The rate of reaction will increase if the concentration of sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, solution increases.
When the concentration of sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, solution increases, the rate of reaction increase.

Variables                     :-
Manipulated variable  : Concentration of sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, solution.
                                    Responding variable   : Rate of reaction.
Controlled variables   : Volume and concentration of sulphuric acid, H2SO4

Operational definition : The time taken for the mark “X” to disappear from sight when the sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, solution react with sulphuric acid, H2SO4
The rate of reaction is measured by how fast the 'X' is hidden by the yellow precipitate

Apparatus                    : 50cm3 measuring cylinder, 100cm3 conical flask, 10cm3 measuring cylinder, stopwatch

Materials                     : 0.2 mol dm-3 sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, solution, 0.1mol dm-3 sulphuric acid, H2SO4, distilled water, white paper marked “X” at the centre

Procedure                    :-

1.      50cm3 of 0.2 mol dm-3 sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, solution is measured with a 50cm3 measuring cylinder and is poured into a conical flask.
2.      The conical flask is placed on the “X” mark on the centre of a piece of white paper.
3.      Using a 10cm3 measuring cylinder, 5cm3 of 0.1mol dm-3 sulphuric acid, H2SO4 is measured.
4.      The sulphuric acid, H2SO4 is immediately and carefully poured into the conical flask containing 50cm3 of sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, solution. At the same time, the stopwatch is started.
5.      The conical flask is shaken slowly throughout the experiment on the white paper.
6.      The mark “X” is observed vertically from the top part of the conical flask through the solution as shown in the figure.
7.      The stopwatch is stopped quickly as the mark “X” on the white paper is no longer visible.
8.      The time taken, t, for the mark “X” to disappear from sight is recorded
9.      Steps 1 to 8 are repeated four more times using different volumes of 0.2 mol dm-3 sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, solution which is diluted with different volumes of distilled water to form 50cm3 of solution as shown in the table. Whereas the other conditions remain unchanged.
10.  The results are recorded in a table.

Data and observations            :-

Interpreting data         :-

1.      Based on the results, two graphs are plotted.
(a)    The graph of the concentration of sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, solution against the time taken for the mark “X” to disappear from sight.
(b)   The graph of the concentration of sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, solution against 1/time.
2.      Based on the graph plotted, determine the relationships between the concentration of sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, solution with   
(a)    The time taken
-          As the concentration of sodium thiosulphate, Na2S203, solution decreases, a longer time is needed for mark ‘X’ to disappear from sight.  Therefore, as the concentration becomes lower, the rate of reaction also decreases.
(b)   1/time
-          The rate of reaction is high when the concentration of sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, solution is high. Concentration of sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, solution is directly proportional to 1/time or rate of reaction.
3.      Deduce the effect of the concentration of a reactant on the rate of reaction.
-          The relationship between the rate of reaction and the concentration of sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, solution is, when the concentration of a reactant increases, the rate of reaction increases.

Discussion                   :-
           
1.      Write down the ionic equation for the reaction between sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, solution and sulphuric acid, H2SO4.
-          S2O32-(aq)   +   2H+(aq)   →   S(s)   +   SO2(g)   +   H2O(l)
2.      Name the pungent smell which is released throughout the experiment?
-          The pungent smell produced is sulphur dioxide gas.
3.      What is represented by 1/time?
-          1/time is a measurement of the rate of reaction.
4.      Why is the same size of conical flasks is used throughout the experiment?
-          Conical flask of the same size and shape are used in this experiment. If a bigger conical flask is used, the time taken for the mark “X” to disappear from sight becomes longer. This is because bigger conical flask has a larger base area. The mixture of 50 cm3 solution becomes shallower. A bigger amount of yellow precipitate is needed to turn the mark “X” invisible from sight.
5.      Hydrochloric acid, HCl with the same concentration is used to replace sulphuric acid, H2SO4 in the experiment.
(a)    How does it affect the rate of reaction?
-          If the experiments is repeated using the same concentration of hydrochloric acid, HCl, to replace sulphuric acid, H2SO4, the rate of reaction will decreases.
(b)   Explain your answer in 5 (a).
-          This because hydrochloric acid, HCl, is a strong monoprotic acid whereas sulphuric acid, H2SO4, is a strong diprotic acid. Although the concentration of acids is the same, the concentration of hydrogen ions in sulphuric acid, H2SO4, is twice the concentration of hydrogen ions in hydrochloric acid, HCl.

Conclusion                  : Hypothesis is accepted. The rate of reaction will increase if the concentration of sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, solution increases.
When the concentration of sodium thiosulphate, Na2S2O3, solution increases, the rate of reaction increase.


Sunday 12 January 2014

PEKA Chemistry form 5 chapter 1 (To study the effect of the size of marble chips, CaCO3, on the rate of the reaction.)

Aim                             : To study the effect of the size of marble chips, CaCO3, on the rate of the                                           reaction.

Problem statement      : How does the size of marble chips, CaCO3, affect the rate of reaction?

Hypothesis                  : When the size of marble chips, CaCO3, is smaller, the rate of reaction increases.

Variables                     :-
                                    Manipulated variable  : Size of marble chips, CaCO3.
                                    Responding variable   : Rate of reaction.
Controlled variables   : Volume and concentration of hydrochloric acid, HCl, mass of marble chips

Operational definition : The changes of gas volume are measured in intervals of 30 seconds when marble chips, CaCo3, added to hydrochloric acid, HCl.
Smaller marble chips have a larger total exposed a\surface area than larger marble chipsof the same size.


Apparatus                    : 50cm3 measuring cylinder, 100cm3 conical flask, rubber stopper with delivery tube, basin, burette, electronic balance, retort stand with clamp, stopwatch

Materials                     : 0.1 mol dm-3 hydrochloric acid, HCl, water, small and large marble chips, CaCO3

Procedure                    :-

1.      40cm3 of 0.1 mol dm-3 hydrochloric acid, HCl, is measured with a measuring cylinder and the poured into the conical flask.
2.      2g of large marble chips, CaCO3, (Set I) is weighed with a electronic balance.
3.      The basin and the burette are filled with water. The burette is inverted in the basin and clamped vertically with a retort stand.
4.      The water level in the burette is adjusted so that the reading of the water level is almost at 50cm3.
5.      The apparatus are set up as shown in the figure.
6.      Pour the of large marble chips, CaCO3, that have been weighed into the conical flask which filled with hydrochloric acid, HCl.
7.      Immediately, the conical flask is covered with a rubber stopper which is joined to the delivery tube. The gas released been channeled into the burette and the stopwatch is started at the same time.
8.      The conical flask is shaken slowly throughout the experiment.
9.      The burette readings are recorded at intervals of 30 seconds for 5 minutes.
10.  Steps 1 to 9 are repeated by replacing the 2g of large marble chips, CaCO3, (Set I) with 2g of small marble chips, CaCO3, (Set II) whereas the other conditions remain unchanged.
11.  The results are recorded in a table.
12.  The volume of carbon dioxide, CO2, gas collected are measured.

Data and observations            :-

Interpreting data         :-

1.      Based on the results, a graph of the total volume of carbon dioxide gas, CO2 collected against time for sets I and II is drawn on the same axis.
2.      Based on the graph plotted, determine 
(a)    The overall average rates of reaction for
(i)                 Set I
(ii)               Set II
(b)   The rates of reaction at
(i)                 60th second
(ii)               90th second
For sets I and II.
3.      Compare the rates of reaction for both sets of experiments.
4.      Deduce the effect of the size of a solid reactant on the rate of reaction.

Discussion                   :-
           
1.      What is the relationship between the size of the marble chips, CaCO3, and the total surface area of ​​marble chips, CaCO3 that is exposed to the reaction?
-          A smaller the size of the marble chips, CaCO3, has a larger total exposed surface area.
2.      What is the relationship between the total surface area of marble chips, CaCO3 and the rate of reaction?
-          The larger the total surface area, the higher the rate of reaction.
3.      Write down the chemical equation for the reaction between marble chips, CaCO3 and hydrochloric acid, HCl.
-          CaCO3(s) + 2HCl(aq) à CaCl2(aq) + H2O(l) + CO2(g)
4.      Calculate the expected maximum volume of carbon dioxide, CO2 that should be collected in both sets I and II.
(Molar volume of gas: 24 dm3 mol-1 at room conditions. Relative atomic mass: C, 12; O, 16; Ca, 40)
-          48cm3
5.      Compare the maximum volume of carbon dioxide, CO2, gas collected in the burette with the expected maximum volume of carbon dioxide, CO2.
-          The volume of carbon dioxide, CO2, gas collected in the burette is less compared to the expected maximum volume of carbon dioxide, CO2, gas.
6.      Explain why there is difference between the volumes of carbon dioxide, CO2.
-          The volume of carbon dioxide collected from the experiment is less compared to its theoretical value. This is due to small amounts of carbon dioxide dissolving in the water.
7.      Suggest a method to overcome the difference between the volumes of carbon dioxide, CO2.
-          To overcome this problem, the water in the burette must be first be saturated with carbon dioxide by passing the gas through the water a few minutes before starting the experiment.


Conclusion                  : Hypothesis accepted. When the size of marble chips, CaCO3, is smaller, the rate of reaction increases.

Wednesday 8 January 2014

PEKA Biologi tingkatan 5 bab 1 (Mengkaji hubungan antara saiz permukaan dengan nisbah jumlah luas permukaan per isi padu (JLP/I).)

Nama                           :-
Kelas                           :-
No. IC                         :-
Tarikh                          :-

Tujuan                      : Mengkaji hubungan antara saiz permukaan dengan nisbah jumlah luas permukaan per isi padu (JLP/I).

Pernyataan masalah     : Adakah saiz sesuatu objek mempengaruhi nisbah jumlah luas permukaan per isi padu (JLP/I).

Hipotesis                     : Semakin besar saiz sesuatu objek, semakin kecil nisbah jumlah luas permukaan per isi padu (JLP/I).

Pemboleh ubah            :-
                                    Dimanipulasikan         : Saiz bongkah.
                                    Bergerak balas             : Jumlah luas permukaan per isi padu bongkah.
                                    Dimalarkan                  : Jenis bongkah.

Bahan dan radas         : Bongkah kubus pelbagai saiz dan pembaris.

Prosedur                      :-

1.      Ukur panjang sisi setiap kubus yang disediakan.
2.      Rekodkan ukuran di dalam jadual yang disediakan.
3.      Hitung jumlah luas permukaan, isi padu, dan JLP/I bagi setiap kubus.
4.      Bandingkan nilai JLP/I dengan saiz kubus.

Keputusan                   :-
Kubus
Panjang sisi (cm)
Jumlah luas permukaan (cm2)
Isi padu (cm3)
JLP/I (cm-1)
P
4.3



Q
6



R
7




Perbicangan                 :-
1.      Nyatakan kubus yang mempunyai jumlah luas permukaan yang paling kecil dan yang paling besar.
-Kubus P mempunyai jumlah luas permukaan yang paling kecil, manakala Kubus R mempunyai jumlah luas permukaan yang paling besar.

2.      Apakah hubungan antara saiz dengan JLP/I?
- Semakin besar saiz sesuatu objek, semakin kecil nisbah jumlah luas permukaan per isi padu (JLP/I).

3.      Andaikan kubus kecil mewakili organisma unisel manakala kubus besar mewakili organisma multisel kompleks. Mengapakah JLP/I bagi organisma unisel lebih tinggi daripada organisma multisel kompleks? Bincangkan.
--JLP/I bagi organisma unisel lebih tinggi kerana sememangnya saiz organisma unisel seperti Ameoba, Paramecium dan lain-lain lebih kecil daripada organisma multisel kompleks seperti manusia.

4.      Apakah kesan JLP/I kepada proses respirasi, perkumuhan dan kehilangan haba daripada badan organisma?
- Nisbah jumlah luas permukaan per isi padu (JLP/I) yang semakin besar akan
mempercepatkan proses respirasi, perkumuhan dan kehilangan haba daripada badan
organisma.

5.      Bagaimana organisma yang mempunyai JLP/I yang kecil mengatasi masalah respirasi dan perkumuhan?
-Organisma yang mempunyai JlP/I yang kecil mengatasi masalah respirasi dan perkumuhan dengan mempunyai sistem pengangkutan yang khusus dan cekap.

Kesimpulan                 : Hipotesis diterima. Semakin besar saiz sesuatu objek, semakin kecil nisbah jumlah luas permukaan per isi padu (JLP/I).